📊 Review Scoring Scale
| Score | Meaning | Recommendation |
|---|
| 9–10 | Exceptional — must accept | Strong accept |
| 7–8 | Strong contribution, well written | Accept |
| 5–6 | Interesting but needs work | Minor Revision |
| 3–4 | Major issues with methodology or clarity | Major Revision |
| 1–2 | Not suitable for this venue | Reject |
✅ Review Checklist
✓
Read the paper at least twice before scoring
✓
Evaluate originality: Is this a new contribution to the field?
✓
Check technical correctness: Are claims supported by evidence?
✓
Assess clarity: Is the paper well-structured and readable?
✓
Verify experiments: Are results reproducible and statistically valid?
✓
Consider related work: Is prior art fairly cited and discussed?
✓
Provide specific, constructive comments with line references
✓
Distinguish major issues (affect validity) from minor issues (presentation)
✓
Submit your review by the deadline — notify the chair if unable
✓
Maintain confidentiality: do not share or discuss the paper